
Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the U.N.'s mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the U.S. could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome. ~George H. W. Bush
...How long would we have had to stay in Baghdad to keep that government in place? What would happen to the government once U.S. forces withdrew? How many casualties should the United States accept in that effort to try to create clarity and stability in a situation that is inherently unstable? I think it is vitally important for a President to know when to use military force. I think it is also very important for him to know when not to commit U.S. military force. And it's my view that the President got it right both times, that it would have been a mistake for us to get bogged down in the quagmire inside Iraq. ~Defense Secretary Dick Cheney
There was a time, before 9/11, when wiser minds prevailed. There were those who knew the consequences of destabilizing Iraq, who were aware of the sectarian tensions waiting to be released into a chaotic monster. (What happened to Cheney? Bitten by a vampire? An alien replicant?) Sure Saddam was a bad guy, but wiser minds weighed the 'bad' that was as better than the 'bad' that would be.
They have yet to be proven wrong, no?
Junior's advisors had a different opinion based not on the historical reality of Iraqi culture, but on their own narrow views of how people behave. Narrow and simple: Saddam is a bad man. Saddam hurts people. Taking away the bad man will make everyone happy. Won't take long, won't cost a lot.
Maybe this is why these folks were labelled the "crazies" in Washington D.C. Maybe this is why both Ronald Reagan and H.W. kept them on a short leash until Dubya loaded his administration with them, and, after 9/11, gave them free reign to set the world on fire.
Now William F. Buckley Jr. says, "Our mission has failed because Iraqi animosities have proved uncontainable by an invading army of 130,000 Americans."
"Failed," he says. Maybe those wiser minds are starting to wake up. After all, the smart question in all of this was, "Is there enough popular support in the region to be successful?" The answer to that question, according to that previous administration, was no. The current administration, based on it's own, insular ideology said yes. Because of 9/11, those who disagreed were either ignored, like Brent Scowcroft, or labelled "Bush hating treasonous angry liberals" by the right-wing propaganda machine.
Dissenters minimized and dismissed, the government controlled by one party in lockstep with the administration, the electorate blinded by fear, the press hiding under the desk and it was off to the races. The modern heroes of the only correct way to think would remake the world.
Now that ideology is buried beneath the rubble of the Dome of the Golden Mosque. History may remember this event as the "What were we thinking?" moment. But that's the problem. We weren't thinking. We allowed ourselves to be cowed by our fear while "the crazies" played the Incompetent Conqueror until creating the perfect FUBAR situation.
The first step in any possible repair is sweep the crazies out of office.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I found myself listening to Fox News the other day, quite by accident, I assure you. I was astonished to hear the Shia belief that the Twelfth Imam would someday return to the Dome of the Golden Mosque labelled a "superstition."
Imagine the Second Coming of Christ labelled the same way.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've noticed quite a few visits from Italy recently, courtesy of Uruknet.info, which has linked to this site. I would like to thank Uruknet for that, and welcome our Italian readers.
Cheers,
Clemsy
QUOTES OF THE WEEK:
Study: Nearly Half of U.S. Presidents Suffered From Mental Illness
The others had no excuse. ~Ironic Times
One can't doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed. ~William F. Buckley Jr.
...[W]henever US or Iraqi security forces succeed in killing or detaining insurgent leaders, there is little effect on the overall scale of the insurgency, whose networks seem able quickly to recover – there are routinely more than 100 attacks every week (the number for January was 433). ~Paul Rogers
Besides, terrorism is not the only new danger of this era. Another is the administration's argument that because the president is commander in chief, he is the "sole organ for the nation in foreign affairs." That non sequitur is refuted by the Constitution's plain language, which empowers Congress to ratify treaties, declare war, fund and regulate military forces, and make laws "necessary and proper" for the execution of all presidential powers . Those powers do not include deciding that a law - FISA, for example - is somehow exempted from the presidential duty to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." ~George Will
Public fears that the nation's ports are not properly protected, combined with the news of an Arab country's takeover of six major ports, proved a combustible mix. ~AP
Leninism was a tragedy in its Bolshevik version, and it has returned as farce when practiced by the United States. ~Francis Fukuyama, reformed neo-con
But, nowadays, even George F. Will is worried. You know you’re in a seriously bad place when that happens. ~David Michael Green
PICKS OF THE WEEK:
Iraq's burning season by Paul Rogers
Iraq's slow burn of the last six weeks has been occurring behind the backs of most of the western media. The bombing on 22 February of one of Shi'a Islam's holiest shrines, the al-Askari mosque (the "golden mosque") in Samarra, has reignited the world's attention. But how does this latest incident, and the retaliatory attacks it has provoked, fit into the unfolding story of Iraq's conflict and United States strategy for the country?
It Didn’t Work by William F. Buckley Jr.
One can't doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed. The same edition of the paper quotes a fellow of the American Enterprise Institute. Mr. Reuel Marc Gerecht backed the American intervention. He now speaks of the bombing of the especially sacred Shiite mosque in Samara and what that has precipitated in the way of revenge. He concludes that “The bombing has completely demolished” what was being attempted — to bring Sunnis into the defense and interior ministries.
No Checks, Many Imbalances By George F. Will
The next time a president asks Congress to pass something akin to what Congress passed on Sept. 14, 2001 - the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) - the resulting legislation might be longer than Proust's "Remembrance of Things Past." Congress, remembering what is happening today, might stipulate all the statutes and constitutional understandings that it does not intend the act to repeal or supersede.
But, then, perhaps no future president will ask for such congressional involvement in the gravest decision government makes - going to war. Why would future presidents ask, if the present administration successfully asserts its current doctrine? It is that whenever the nation is at war, the other two branches of government have a radically diminished pertinence to governance, and the president determines what that pertinence shall be. This monarchical doctrine emerges from the administration's stance that warrantless surveillance by the National Security Agency targeting American citizens on American soil is a legal exercise of the president's inherent powers as commander in chief, even though it violates the clear language of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which was written to regulate wartime surveillance.
"Leninists!" Cries Neo-Con Nabob, Suing for Divorce by Jim Lobe
Francis Fukuyama, best known for his post-Cold War essay proclaiming the historic inevitability of liberal democracy, "The End of History", argued in the Times article that neo-conservatives so badly miscalculated the myriad costs of the Iraq war that they may have empowered their two foreign policy nemeses -- realists, who disdain democracy promotion; and isolationists, who oppose foreign entanglements of almost any kind.
Even more provocatively, Fukuyama called the Standard's editor, William Kristol, his ideological sidekick, Robert Kagan, and their neo-conservative comrades who led the drive to war in Iraq "Leninist" in their conviction that liberal democracy can be achieved through "coercive regime change" or imposed by military means.
Osama, Saddam and the Ports By Paul Krugman
The storm of protest over the planned takeover of some U.S. port operations by Dubai Ports World doesn't make sense viewed in isolation. The Bush administration clearly made no serious effort to ensure that the deal didn't endanger national security. But that's nothing new - the administration has spent the past four and a half years refusing to do anything serious about protecting the nation's ports.
HEADLINES
Can You Say "Permanent Bases"? The American Press Can't
by Tom Engelhardt
...How can anybody tell if the Bush administration is actually withdrawing from Iraq or not? Sometimes, when trying to cut through a veritable fog of misinformation and disinformation, it helps to focus on something concrete. In the case of Iraq, nothing could be more concrete -- though less generally discussed in our media -- than the set of enormous bases the Pentagon has long been building in that country. Quite literally multi-billions of dollars have gone into them. In a prestigious engineering magazine in late 2003, Lt. Col. David Holt, the Army engineer "tasked with facilities development" in Iraq, was already speaking proudly of several billion dollars being sunk into base construction ("the numbers are staggering"). Since then, the base-building has been massive and ongoing.
In a country in such startling disarray, these bases, with some of the most expensive and advanced communications systems on the planet, are like vast spaceships that have landed from another solar system. Representing a staggering investment of resources, effort, and geostrategic dreaming, they are the unlikeliest places for the Bush administration to hand over willingly to even the friendliest of Iraqi governments.
UAE royals, bin Laden's saviours
The Central Intelligence Agency did not target Al Qaeda chief Osama bin laden once as he had the royal family of the United Arab Emirates with him in Afghanistan, the agency's director, George Tenet, told the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States on Thursday.
Bush Would Veto Any Bill Halting Dubai Port Deal
President Bush, trying to put down a rapidly escalating rebellion among leaders of his own party, said Tuesday that he would veto any legislation blocking a deal for a state-owned company in Dubai to take over the management of port terminals in New York, Miami, Baltimore and other major American cities.
W aides' biz ties to Arab firm
The Dubai firm that won Bush administration backing to run six U.S. ports has at least two ties to the White House.
U.S. Reclassifies Many Documents in Secret Review
In a seven-year-old secret program at the National Archives, intelligence agencies have been removing from public access thousands of historical documents that were available for years, including some already published by the State Department and others photocopied years ago by private historians.
At Spy Agencies, No Good Deed Goes Unpunished
This was the picture painted to a House of Representatives committee last week, as its members heard from five soldiers and civilians who say their livelihoods and reputations have been destroyed or placed in serious jeopardy by their attempts to expose and correct waste, fraud or abuse in their workplaces.
U.S. terror fears, stoked by Bush, now bite him
The president, who has cast himself as America's protector against terrorism and Islamic militancy, has been thrown on the defensive by a bipartisan revolt over his administration's approval of a state-owned company from the United Arab Emirates assuming operation of six major U.S. seaports.
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
Time to impeach Bush
Those blasphemously "liberal" media outlets have once again deprived the American public of widespread coverage of nothing less than startling poll results. The non-partisan polling firm Zogby International last month found that by a margin of 52 percent to 43 percent, Americans want Congress to consider impeaching President Bush "if he wiretapped American citizens without a judge's approval."
Peace groups under watch
In the post-9/11 world, some unlikely figures have attracted the attention of local police and federal agents: the Raging Grannies, known for musical satire, and Quaker peace activists, known for non-violence.
OCCUPATION: IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN
Explosion Destroys Dome of Shiite Shrine
A large explosion destroyed the golden dome of one of Iraq's most famous Shiite shrines Wednesday, spawning mass protests and triggering reprisal attacks against Sunni mosques. It was the third major attack against Shiite targets this week and threatened to enflame sectarian tensions.
Police Tied to Death Squads
A 1,500-member Iraqi police force with close ties to Shiite militia groups has emerged as a focus of investigations into suspected death squads working within the country's Interior Ministry.
Dozens Slain in Iraq Sectarian Violence
Gunmen shot dead 47 civilians and left their bodies in a ditch near Baghdad Thursday as militia battles and sectarian reprisals followed the bombing of a sacred Shiite shrine. Sunni Arabs suspended their participation in talks on a new government.
Attacks Surge in Iraq Despite Curfew
A car bomb exploded in a Shiite holy city and 13 members of one Shiite family were gunned down northeast of the capital Saturday in a surge of attacks that killed at least 30 people despite heightened security aimed at curbing sectarian violence following the bombing of a revered Shiite shrine.
OPINION
Why We Need Leakers
By Richard Cohen
In the latest issue of Foreign Affairs, Paul R. Pillar, the CIA's top guy for the Middle East during the run-up to the war in Iraq, speaks from retirement to show how the Bush administration selectively used intelligence. Among other things, the consensus at the CIA was that there was no link between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. And while the spooks of Langley more or less concurred that Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, they also thought his nuclear program was years away from fruition. In short, there was no urgent reason to go to war.
G.O.P. to W.: You're Nuts! by Maureen Dowd
What kind of empire are we if we have to outsource our coastline to a group of sheiks who don't recognize Israel, in a country where money was laundered for the 9/11 attacks? And that let A. Q. Kahn, the Pakistani nuclear scientist, smuggle nuclear components through its port to Libya, North Korea and Iran?
SLANDER? SHE WROTE THE BOOK By Ted Rall
My utterances occasionally spark controversy but I've got nothing on Ann Coulter. The star Republican pundit, who has spewed more racist, offensive and defamatory slurs in a week than Louis Farrakhan and Pat Robertson have in their whole lives combined, has turned slander and threats of violence into a cottage industry.
